Comments on: Joao Magueijo: Frontier Cosmology http://roychristopher.com/joao-magueijo-frontier-cosmology I marshal the middle between Mathers and McLuhan. Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:27:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Robert Browning http://roychristopher.com/joao-magueijo-frontier-cosmology/comment-page-1#comment-6904 Robert Browning Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:32:12 +0000 http://roychristopher.com/joao-magueijo-frontier-cosmology#comment-6904 Big Bang and Black Holes. Black holes are shown as a vortex. Science fiction not science fact. They are an almost empty sphere in space and there are only two ways of knowing they exist. Firstly by thier gravitational efect on stars in thier vicinity,and from this we can calculate thier mass. Secondly,as a star is "consumed" it leaves a plume of light,possibly the result of atoms being torn apart similar to an atomic bomb.Despite the science fiction view this occurs very rarely and black holes are,for majority of the time totaly invisible.Black holes will never be seen. Even from a distance that particular area of space would appear to be full of stars.The reason for this is explained in Einstein,s Theory Of General Relativity where massive gravity bends lighe so as to make stars behind such force to appear as if the black hole was never there. Also Gravitational Lensing would even make it appear crowded as we would see several images of a single star behind the black hole appear in front of it. It was from a black hole that all universal matter came at moment of the BIG BANG, and Prof. Magueijo has calculated the exact time of that. What he didn,t take into account was gravity.We know gravity in a black hole is so great it tears even atoms apart and draws matter in at excess of light speed, and the escape velocity by necessity has therefore to be greater than light speed. Light and time can,t exist seperately. Inside the Schwartschild Radius of a black hole we know neither exist. When the big bang occured there was a minute gap in time from the explosion to when matter slowed to light speed. It was this gap that Prof.Magueijo mistakenly took to be a period of "Variable Light Speed." This was his only mistake as his calculations match perfectly with the beginning of both time and light. Robert L.Browning. Big Bang and Black Holes.
Black holes are shown as a vortex. Science fiction not science fact. They are an almost empty sphere in space and there are only two ways of knowing they exist. Firstly by thier gravitational efect on stars in thier vicinity,and from this we can calculate thier mass. Secondly,as a star is “consumed” it leaves a plume of light,possibly the result of atoms being torn apart similar to an atomic bomb.Despite the science fiction view this occurs very rarely and black holes are,for majority of the time totaly invisible.Black holes will never be seen. Even from a distance that particular area of space would appear to be full of stars.The reason for this is explained in Einstein,s Theory Of General Relativity where massive gravity bends lighe so as to make stars behind such force to appear as if the black hole was never there. Also Gravitational Lensing would even make it appear crowded as we would see several images of a single star behind the black hole appear in front of it.
It was from a black hole that all universal matter came at moment of the BIG BANG, and Prof. Magueijo has calculated the exact time of that. What he didn,t take into account was gravity.We know gravity in a black hole is so great it tears even atoms apart and draws matter in at excess of light speed, and the escape velocity by necessity has therefore to be greater than light speed. Light and time can,t exist seperately. Inside the Schwartschild Radius of a black hole we know neither exist. When the big bang occured there was a minute gap in time from the explosion to when matter slowed to light speed. It was this gap that Prof.Magueijo mistakenly took to be a period of “Variable Light Speed.”
This was his only mistake as his calculations match perfectly with the beginning of both time and light.
Robert L.Browning.

]]> By: Keith Moseley http://roychristopher.com/joao-magueijo-frontier-cosmology/comment-page-1#comment-5827 Keith Moseley Tue, 03 Feb 2009 22:41:02 +0000 http://roychristopher.com/joao-magueijo-frontier-cosmology#comment-5827 I've just seen Joao Magueijo's big bang theory on the Discovery chanel, I've no scientific degrees or anything but thought his varying speed of light was interesting, light travels at a constant in a vaccum, space is a vaccum but is it empty and can we make a vaccum that is empty?. I don't think we can, space now is polluted with all kind of rays and stuff that could slow light down, would the very early universe be as polluted as it now is?, if it was less polluted maybe light was faster. Just my two penneth. Keith Moseley sleepwalker13@hotmail.com I’ve just seen Joao Magueijo’s big bang theory on the Discovery chanel, I’ve no scientific degrees or anything but thought his varying speed of light was interesting, light travels at a constant in a vaccum, space is a vaccum but is it empty and can we make a vaccum that is empty?. I don’t think we can, space now is polluted with all kind of rays and stuff that could slow light down, would the very early universe be as polluted as it now is?, if it was less polluted maybe light was faster.

Just my two penneth.

Keith Moseley

moc.liamtohnull@31reklawpeels

]]> By: Roy Christopher http://roychristopher.com/joao-magueijo-frontier-cosmology/comment-page-1#comment-5502 Roy Christopher Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:34:02 +0000 http://roychristopher.com/joao-magueijo-frontier-cosmology#comment-5502 Doesn't this guy have his own website by now? Just sayin'... Doesn’t this guy have his own website by now?

Just sayin’…

]]> By: Steven Turner http://roychristopher.com/joao-magueijo-frontier-cosmology/comment-page-1#comment-5499 Steven Turner Wed, 04 Jun 2008 01:37:41 +0000 http://roychristopher.com/joao-magueijo-frontier-cosmology#comment-5499 I don’t know where to start, but I need to start somewhere, thus would you take the time to read this? My name is Steven Turner, and I am a physicist in my own right. I started writing about psychology when I was thirteen years old and continued until I was twenty-two. I had not had a teacher of this, so I did all my examinations alone. When I was about twenty-three, my mind began changing focus towards the way our universe works. Again having no teacher, I had to figure it out alone. I wanted to determine how our atom works. I began testing personal theories about simple mathematical codes that the universe could use. Instead of trying to actually see what was going on in an atom, I tried to establish the only possible code that an atom could operate with. This seemed easier for I had no access to a collider, which I had no idea even existed at the time. I spent roughly three years figuring out a code that worked easily, simply, and well. Once I got this done, I signed up for a few classes at a college in order to slightly test my theories. I took a simple algebra class and a psychology class. I tried to show the math teacher some of my work, but not only did he seem to look at me as lesser than him, but he also seemed completely uninterested with my years of work. I suppose I really cant expect more from a teacher that’s just wants to teach his class, and pass no judgment, but I attained multitudes of universal information during attendance of the class. During my psychology class, it was as if I were at home, seeing things I had never noticed before. Within a few classes I noticed that the makeup of the mind was tightly comparable to the composure of the atom. I began connecting the known knowledge of psychology, with my theories of what I now call atomics, or universal mathematics. Soon I had begun creating something I would like to introduce to the world of science, as ((Psychological Atomics)). I believe I can explain how our minds follow the exact nature of atomic signatures, signals, transfers, disturbances, equations, and much more. I may not be a professional in the eyes of acknowledged world scientists, but I do have a great deal of heart for this. I believe that the universe is so simple that it may be easy to decipher its mechanisms by comparing everything we see around us. Mathematics is universal and associates with every natural world existence. Instead of just breaking the atom down I went straight for what I like to call the ((Bottom)). After briefly reading into some reports, I found that many call the bottom, the ((God particle)). I am trying to crack the atom code in a mobile home, within a small town of Arizona. I CAN DO IT!! All I need is a little time with professionals that I don’t know how to get in touch with. I have put atomics into algebraic and geometric formats and although I don’t have this code complete, I think I am closer than I should be. I can easily explain why light travels faster than sound, and why we don’t age while traveling at the speed of light, in a way no one understands. Time measurement is easy to define and calculate in its smallest increment with this theory. I can make it complex enough to evade many, or easy enough for a grade school student to understand. I have over five hundred pages of journalism and diagrams to share with the scientific world, and whether or not it can ever be taken seriously, I would like to share it with someone. It doesn’t matter who figures these things out, it only matters that we do. I believe that I have a good idea of what happened seven steps before the Big Bang, why there is more dark matter than matter, and what the smallest increment of matter is. I watched a man on the science channel talk about his theory that light use to travel faster at one point, and I believe I can fill in the blanks. A friend monkeyrun26@hotmail.com I don’t know where to start, but I need to start somewhere, thus would you take the time to read this? My name is Steven Turner, and I am a physicist in my own right. I started writing about psychology when I was thirteen years old and continued until I was twenty-two. I had not had a teacher of this, so I did all my examinations alone. When I was about twenty-three, my mind began changing focus towards the way our universe works. Again having no teacher, I had to figure it out alone. I wanted to determine how our atom works. I began testing personal theories about simple mathematical codes that the universe could use. Instead of trying to actually see what was going on in an atom, I tried to establish the only possible code that an atom could operate with. This seemed easier for I had no access to a collider, which I had no idea even existed at the time. I spent roughly three years figuring out a code that worked easily, simply, and well. Once I got this done, I signed up for a few classes at a college in order to slightly test my theories. I took a simple algebra class and a psychology class. I tried to show the math teacher some of my work, but not only did he seem to look at me as lesser than him, but he also seemed completely uninterested with my years of work. I suppose I really cant expect more from a teacher that’s just wants to teach his class, and pass no judgment, but I attained multitudes of universal information during attendance of the class. During my psychology class, it was as if I were at home, seeing things I had never noticed before. Within a few classes I noticed that the makeup of the mind was tightly comparable to the composure of the atom. I began connecting the known knowledge of psychology, with my theories of what I now call atomics, or universal mathematics. Soon I had begun creating something I would like to introduce to the world of science, as ((Psychological Atomics)). I believe I can explain how our minds follow the exact nature of atomic signatures, signals, transfers, disturbances, equations, and much more. I may not be a professional in the eyes of acknowledged world scientists, but I do have a great deal of heart for this. I believe that the universe is so simple that it may be easy to decipher its mechanisms by comparing everything we see around us. Mathematics is universal and associates with every natural world existence. Instead of just breaking the atom down I went straight for what I like to call the ((Bottom)). After briefly reading into some reports, I found that many call the bottom, the ((God particle)). I am trying to crack the atom code in a mobile home, within a small town of Arizona. I CAN DO IT!! All I need is a little time with professionals that I don’t know how to get in touch with. I have put atomics into algebraic and geometric formats and although I don’t have this code complete, I think I am closer than I should be. I can easily explain why light travels faster than sound, and why we don’t age while traveling at the speed of light, in a way no one understands. Time measurement is easy to define and calculate in its smallest increment with this theory. I can make it complex enough to evade many, or easy enough for a grade school student to understand. I have over five hundred pages of journalism and diagrams to share with the scientific world, and whether or not it can ever be taken seriously, I would like to share it with someone. It doesn’t matter who figures these things out, it only matters that we do. I believe that I have a good idea of what happened seven steps before the Big Bang, why there is more dark matter than matter, and what the smallest increment of matter is. I watched a man on the science channel talk about his theory that light use to travel faster at one point, and I believe I can fill in the blanks.

A friend
moc.liamtohnull@62nuryeknom

]]> By: Michael http://roychristopher.com/joao-magueijo-frontier-cosmology/comment-page-1#comment-5481 Michael Sun, 01 Jun 2008 23:11:39 +0000 http://roychristopher.com/joao-magueijo-frontier-cosmology#comment-5481 Just getting to sit down and take a read with the book. Just hope it gives apt credit to Moffat which your TV show failed miserably to do. Just getting to sit down and take a read with the book. Just hope it gives apt credit to Moffat which your TV show failed miserably to do.

]]> By: Denver Davis http://roychristopher.com/joao-magueijo-frontier-cosmology/comment-page-1#comment-5467 Denver Davis Wed, 28 May 2008 16:00:07 +0000 http://roychristopher.com/joao-magueijo-frontier-cosmology#comment-5467 At the age of 65, I'm still trying to wrap my head around Einstein. Digesting Magueijo throws another wild card in the deck. I gave up, long ago, trying to make sense of theoretical physics. Magueijo says that the fine print will tell you that it is, in fact, mostly theory. My ancient BSEE did not prepare me to deal with very much theory. It is, however, a look at some, long overdue, fresh thought. My wife says that its difficult to get me "fired up", but Magueijo did. 'nuf sed Denver Davis At the age of 65, I’m still trying to wrap my head around Einstein. Digesting Magueijo throws another wild card in the deck. I gave up, long ago, trying to make sense of theoretical physics. Magueijo says that the fine print will tell you that it is, in fact, mostly theory. My ancient BSEE did not prepare me to deal with very much theory. It is, however, a look at some, long overdue, fresh thought. My wife says that its difficult to get me “fired up”, but Magueijo did.
‘nuf sed
Denver Davis

]]> By: Ray Criddle http://roychristopher.com/joao-magueijo-frontier-cosmology/comment-page-1#comment-5442 Ray Criddle Wed, 21 May 2008 02:55:38 +0000 http://roychristopher.com/joao-magueijo-frontier-cosmology#comment-5442 Could VSL contribute to the Pioneer Anomaly ??? Good work Joao. Could VSL contribute to the Pioneer Anomaly ??? Good work Joao.

]]> By: billc http://roychristopher.com/joao-magueijo-frontier-cosmology/comment-page-1#comment-5402 billc Wed, 14 May 2008 09:47:11 +0000 http://roychristopher.com/joao-magueijo-frontier-cosmology#comment-5402 spacetime is elastic.so is any kind of radiation,including visible light.or is redshift wrong?. why shouldnt gravity suffer similar consequences? the universe is elastic. the speed of light will drop as the universe grows. the pull of gravity does the same. and matter becomes a smaller percentage as the volume it occupies as space expands(stretches)dark matters arse....billc-chevrolet mechanic and lay pissicist spacetime is elastic.so is any kind of radiation,including visible light.or is redshift wrong?. why shouldnt gravity suffer similar consequences? the universe is elastic. the speed of light will drop as the universe grows. the pull of gravity does the same. and matter becomes a smaller percentage as the volume it occupies as space expands(stretches)dark matters arse….billc-chevrolet mechanic and lay pissicist

]]> By: Umar http://roychristopher.com/joao-magueijo-frontier-cosmology/comment-page-1#comment-5401 Umar Wed, 14 May 2008 09:03:18 +0000 http://roychristopher.com/joao-magueijo-frontier-cosmology#comment-5401 I totally agree with Joao----But the clues you are looking for are hidden in GOA---If ya know what that means-- I totally agree with Joao—-But the clues you are looking for are hidden in GOA—If ya know what that means–

]]> By: Randy Hoff http://roychristopher.com/joao-magueijo-frontier-cosmology/comment-page-1#comment-5400 Randy Hoff Wed, 14 May 2008 08:54:22 +0000 http://roychristopher.com/joao-magueijo-frontier-cosmology#comment-5400 Dated: May 14, 2008 I am new to all these theories, but I have been gestitating on these and other topics of interest. I am toying with idea that our current theories of the origin of the universe and the nature of physics is one in the same problem. And I think the answer lies in better understanding of what space is. As I think and look into the matter space is just not a void with nothing in it, but space has texture and shape to it. And like any other material from which that fabric is made from will determine its "properties" or physics. Thus I think look into not just the concept of the entrophy of energy but more importantly the entrophy of space - primordial space. Joao Magueijo's ideas are step in the right direction that will lead to that ultimate equation that solves the riddle of the universe and unites all the laws of nature in one. That will lead to incredible discoveries and quantum leaps in science and technology. But will we have the morals and ethics to use just knowledge wisely and justly and not just for power and gain. The fate of mankind and future of civilization may very well depend upon what choice we make individually and collectively. RH Dated: May 14, 2008

I am new to all these theories, but I have been gestitating on these and other topics of interest. I am toying with idea that our current theories of the origin of the universe and the nature of physics is one in the same problem. And I think the answer lies in better understanding of what space is. As I think and look into the matter space is just not a void with nothing in it, but space has texture and shape to it. And like any other material from which that fabric is made from will determine its “properties” or physics. Thus I think look into not just the concept of the entrophy of energy but more importantly the entrophy of space – primordial space. Joao Magueijo’s ideas are step in the right direction that will lead to that ultimate equation that solves the riddle of the universe and unites all the laws of nature in one. That will lead to incredible discoveries and quantum leaps in science and technology. But will we have the morals and ethics to use just knowledge wisely and justly and not just for power and gain. The fate of mankind and future of civilization may very well depend upon what choice we make individually and collectively.

RH

]]>