<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mind Wide Shut: Recent Books on Mind and Metaphor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roychristopher.com/mind-wide-shut-the-stuff-of-thought/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roychristopher.com/mind-wide-shut-the-stuff-of-thought</link>
	<description>Media Theorist, Music Geek, Aging Skateboard/BMX Kid.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:42:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maker Faire, 2008: Austin, Texas &#124; Roy Christopher</title>
		<link>http://roychristopher.com/mind-wide-shut-the-stuff-of-thought/comment-page-1#comment-5765</link>
		<dc:creator>Maker Faire, 2008: Austin, Texas &#124; Roy Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 23:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roychristopher.com/?p=702#comment-5765</guid>
		<description>[...] had the pleasure of seeing Gary Marcus talk about his book Kluge, where he introduced us to the term &#8220;buttfact&#8221; (answers one [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] had the pleasure of seeing Gary Marcus talk about his book Kluge, where he introduced us to the term &#8220;buttfact&#8221; (answers one [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Christopher</title>
		<link>http://roychristopher.com/mind-wide-shut-the-stuff-of-thought/comment-page-1#comment-5327</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 15:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roychristopher.com/?p=702#comment-5327</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments and recommendations, Gyrus. I&#039;m not scared of relativism. :]

&lt;i&gt;Kluge&lt;/i&gt; is a very practical book, and in it Marcus doesn&#039;t touch on the mystical at all. I still recommend it though, not only for its practical tack, but also for its lucidity and its levity. It&#039;s a highly readable book about what is typically a very heavy subject, without being a dumbing-down of the science involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments and recommendations, Gyrus. I&#8217;m not scared of relativism. :]</p>
<p><i>Kluge</i> is a very practical book, and in it Marcus doesn&#8217;t touch on the mystical at all. I still recommend it though, not only for its practical tack, but also for its lucidity and its levity. It&#8217;s a highly readable book about what is typically a very heavy subject, without being a dumbing-down of the science involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gyrus</title>
		<link>http://roychristopher.com/mind-wide-shut-the-stuff-of-thought/comment-page-1#comment-5326</link>
		<dc:creator>Gyrus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 12:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roychristopher.com/?p=702#comment-5326</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the book tips. On the more poetic-psychological side of things, I recently read Robert Romanyshyn&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Mirror and Metaphor: Images and Stories of Psychological Life&lt;/i&gt;, which is worth a go. Certainly far too relativist for Pinker (let alone wayward and oblique), it&#039;s also, thanks to its deeply phenomenological grounding, filled with convincing observations about how narrative and metaphor form the basis of human consciousness.

I&#039;ve some time for the &quot;kluge&quot; theory (I recall Arthur Koestler being a fan of the idea that the mismatching between the older and new parts of the brain explain our schizoid tendencies). Does any part of his theory account for the capacity---at times at least---that humans have for acting with great integration? At least, feeling it---does he see mystical experiences of oneness as &quot;illusion&quot;, a forgetting of the haphazard brain?

Related to all this, I recommend Steven Mithen&#039;s &lt;i&gt;The Prehistory of the Mind&lt;/i&gt;. His theory is that &quot;modules&quot; of intelligence evolved in the hominid line (e.g. social intelligence, technical intelligence, etc.), and the &lt;i&gt;sapiens sapiens&lt;/i&gt; breakthrough was to create interchange between them, &quot;cognitive fluidity&quot;. His metaphor is of a cathedral with distinct chapels; we breach the walls between the chapels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the book tips. On the more poetic-psychological side of things, I recently read Robert Romanyshyn&#8217;s <i>Mirror and Metaphor: Images and Stories of Psychological Life</i>, which is worth a go. Certainly far too relativist for Pinker (let alone wayward and oblique), it&#8217;s also, thanks to its deeply phenomenological grounding, filled with convincing observations about how narrative and metaphor form the basis of human consciousness.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve some time for the &#8220;kluge&#8221; theory (I recall Arthur Koestler being a fan of the idea that the mismatching between the older and new parts of the brain explain our schizoid tendencies). Does any part of his theory account for the capacity&#8212;at times at least&#8212;that humans have for acting with great integration? At least, feeling it&#8212;does he see mystical experiences of oneness as &#8220;illusion&#8221;, a forgetting of the haphazard brain?</p>
<p>Related to all this, I recommend Steven Mithen&#8217;s <i>The Prehistory of the Mind</i>. His theory is that &#8220;modules&#8221; of intelligence evolved in the hominid line (e.g. social intelligence, technical intelligence, etc.), and the <i>sapiens sapiens</i> breakthrough was to create interchange between them, &#8220;cognitive fluidity&#8221;. His metaphor is of a cathedral with distinct chapels; we breach the walls between the chapels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
